John Dunkle's Anti-Abortion Prisoner Newsletter.

 Monthly newsletter published by John Dunkle consisting mainly of correspondence with imprisoned anti-abortionists.
Website Web – skyp1.blogspot.com
Email – jdmd@ptd.net

  Abortion is Murder 6-3 May 3, 2008

Formerly Stop the Killing of Young People (skyp) and soon, perhaps, Stop Killing Preemies

May 3, 2008, Vol. 6, No. 3
PO Box 7424, Reading, PA 19603
Phone message –484-651-0212, 610-396-0332
Email – johndunk@ptd.net
Web – skyp1.blogspot.com
Circulation – 28
John Dunkle, Editor

This is the headline you never saw in 2004. Imagine if a law were passed against Roe v. Wade and no one knew? That's why I get Frequently Asked Questions about Laci's Law:

What is "Laci's Law"?
"Laci and Connor's Law” ( 18 U.S. Code § 1841 ) was passed in 2004. The U.S. Congress responded to the enormous outpouring of public sympathy over the murder of Laci Peterson and her son, by her husband, Scott, somewhere in or between Modesto and San Francisco Bay, California, in 2002. Yes, this is the case you heard about.

Why make a law? Laci carried a child she loved so much she named him, Connor, before he was even born. Geraldo Rivera, no friend to life, called Connor "Laci Peterson's unborn son" on the TV. When the wind shifts, some know.
Connor, eight months gestation, was expelled shortly after Laci's murder, dying before, or, drowning after birth/stillbirth. His and his Mom's bodies washed up on Berkeley beach.
"Laci and Connor's Law" made it a separate, federal crime to kill an unborn child, connected or unconnected with an attack on his or her mother. The law is in force in Fed. situations: Fed. property, parks, military, trains, cruise ships, etc.
But how can the Fed. pass a law outlawing the murder of an unborn child, and still uphold Roe? Because you and I are asleep. The pro-aborts are terrified we'll wake up. Now is the time for all born people to come to the aid of American moms and babies, and through them, the kids’ genocide overseas with our technology, investment capital pressure and ideology. Please read on.

What do the prolifers on the Supreme Court say? They're waiting for you to bring a case. You can't just knock on the door of the Court and bring flowers. You’ve got to bring a case, or find one, or help one that is there already. The pro-abort pols know this, are terrified of it, freely admit this will stop Roe, and have said so on record in Congress, while we were sleeping.

Isn't this just a "headline" law? Can't it be overturned by "Clinton Republicans"? No. Laci's Law follows state fetal homicide laws, which have been around for decades and which are very solid law. Scott Peterson is in San Quentin partly because California has one. The beauty of Laci is that, unlike some state "fetal" homicide laws, this law positively declared all unborns, even kids from a rape, or birth defected, or whatever, from day one of conception, as being definite human beings, and alive, and legal persons in the whole sense, and if they are killed, it is homicide. You can't murder a turnip.

So how come we never heard about this before? It's been three years.
The prolife movement is sleeping. (Ssssssh!) Don't wake it up. Just go about your business one-to-one, and tell people that you know about this.

Why would Congress care about one dead baby? There are so many.
Laci Peterson was a devout Hispanic Christian. Her family browbeat the press into prosecuting Scott back when no one cared. Hispanics love life, babies and families. Mainstream prolifers are diffident or tired, or, the Last Greatest Generation has left us. They took the sense of urgency and can-do of Depression survival and WW II victory with them. We need it back. Have you got it?

If Laci and Connor's Law outlaws murder of unborns, why is abortion still around?
Laci and Connor's Law has an "abortion exception" clause ( § 1841 (c)). I know -- totally schizophrenic. This clause, however, does not stop Laci and Connor's Law from "flipping" (reversing) Roe.

How could Laci’s Law “flip” Roe? I thought you'd never ask! Roe has a separate clause in it, the Blackmun, or the Establishment Clause, which states that any future establishment of human life as a legal person would nullify Roe. “[Texas argues] that the 'fetus' is a person. In support of this, they outline.the well-known facts of fetal development. If this suggestion of personhood is established, the [pro-aborts’] case collapses, of course, for the right to life would then be guaranteed specifically by the [Constitution]” (Roe v. Wade 410 US 156/7, et seg.)

So. Laci's Law establishes unborn babies as legal persons? You got it! Laci's Law, subsection (d) states: "An unborn child is a member of the species Homo sapiens living in the
uterus." Subsections (a) and (b) state that this child can be murdered, and if so, the murderer will receive the exact
same punishment as for murdering a born person.

Good. So how about this “abortion exception”?
The "abortion exception" clause in Laci's Law says you can't use Laci's Law directly to outlaw abortion, but it says nothing about using Laci's Law to flip Roe. It's a two-step process. First, the Supes apply subsections 1841 (a), (b) and (d) of Laci's Law to the Establishment Clause of Roe, and find that they satisfy it. Then, later, if Texas or some other states outlaw abortion, that's another matter, separate from Laci's Law.

Sounds tricky. The Lord knows the way through the wilderness. All we have to do is follow. If you've got a better idea, I'm all ears. Meanwhile, let's pray, pray, pray, and act. Quick. Real quick

How about choice?
Babies choose life! Just deliver 'em and ask 'em! So do their moms. Read the testimonials: silentnomoreawareness.org, or Google the phrase. Many, many of those women state flat-out they would never have gotten an abortion if it were illegal. Any experienced sidewalk or CPC counselor will tell you outlawing abortion will take pressure off young moms, so they can do what they want to do anyway, and the younger young women will see
how it goes, and adapt. Otherwise, they're just at the mercy of predatory males (13 or 33), irresponsible husbands, or even procurement experts or “coyotes.”

Why would this work, when states have been attacking Roe for years about 24-hour-notice laws, etc? It's a total sea-change now. Personhood is legally established now. Plus, part of the reason it will work is because the pro-aborts admit it will! They said it in Congress during the Laci's Law debates (Sessions, 108th). And, they say it now:
“ . . . unborn children, whether viable or not, will be considered as human beings, and therefore, whole as persons as victims of crime.”
"[Laci's Law] extension of legal personhood to a [baby] is entirely unprecedented in the history of federal law."
"[The Supreme Court] could be forced to do what it has avoided for over thirty years: determine the ultimate value of the life interest and decide when that life interest begins." (155 Syr.L.Rev. JJ[2004])

But the Court has struggled with this before...?
Not on these terms. "When faced with the deprivation of life and the deprivation of privacy/liberty, the Court would arguably be more willing to make a trade-off to protect the life interest." (ibid.) These are pro-aborts talking, saying this stuff. Let's say it louder and earlier. Let's say it in court. Hurry up!

Any other signs this is a critical moment? Sandra Day O'Connor, no friend of life, said Roe is on a collision course with state fetal homicide laws (paraphrase).
She said this before Laci's Law even existed. Let's have a collision now, before another 50 million babies and moms get
toasted, huh?

But these are words. How do we know that even a good Court would interpret it right?
Prayer. But hurry up. We never would have got this far, embryo massacres, etc., if we had resisted surgical abortion back then. Now, everyone has moved on. If we don't exploit this now, Mercy of God, what's next? Next it will be 16 years of Dowager Empress Court appointments and health care, with federal ID cards, human cloning, artificial wombs, "period" checks by the nurses at the high schools, more genocide of Third World rainbow peoples. You watch. "Global warming" is the smokescreen. I guarantee it. If we don't give them something to be busy about, they will give us something to be busy about. Let's set the agenda now. Laci's Law will be our rallying cry. CNN or Fox picked this up for just one day, and then dropped it like a hot potato. (Could Laci's Law overturn Roe? Nov.’06)

How about the South Dakota law? Only a constitutional amendment can trump the Supes . . . unless the Supes trump themselves when they see Laci's Law
reverses their own decision, just as it says in the Establishment Clause. The Supes have reversed themselves thirty-four times.

This is all legal gobbledygook to me. What can I do to help? You can't write your congressman, they've already voted. You can't write your lobby group, they already lobbied, thank
God. We all know nothin' new is happening in the next 16 years except massive distraction from babies in the form of wars, new wars, government takeover of hospitals, cloning, etc.

I could write the President. He's the one who crowed over this "culture of life." He'll back up whatever else we do, I bet. Hurry up.

What if the Supreme Court doesn't see it this way?
They won't, if we wait long enough. Liberal Supes have their doctors and respirator repairmen on speed dial. All they gotta do is hang on till the first Wednesday AM in Nov., '08, and then it’s clear sailing, fifty more years of baby dismemberment. We're in a narrow window, and it took a lot of sweat and Providence to get here. We're wasting it. The window will open and shut while we're sleeping.

I’M PRAYING YOU'LL READ THIS PARAGRAPH.

HEY, A GUY CAN DREAM, RIGHT?

OK, I'm scared. What can I do, really? This will be the work of the Holy Spirit, or it will be nothing. Give the kids some crayons, give the spouse a Netflick, and sit down in a quiet place and write down the name of anyone you ever met who ever gave a damn about anything. Then cross off the names of the naysayers, Eeyores, criticizers. Be sure to add the names of quiet, mild Christians who aren't self-starters but never criticize. This is a prayer warrior operation.

...and then?
Beseech Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ to give you an answer, as He wills, whether to mail a copy of this to them. He will, as He wills. But go to Him empty-handed, open-ended. Don't make conditions. Don't ask for other things. Pray for 9 or 10 days, huh? Pray alone, for hours at a time, walking around the block, or at dawn, or dusk, or in the middle of the night. Just pray. Then, if He doesn't drop a piano on your head out of the sky, and you feel a peace about it, then please mail it out, quick. Suggestion: Put Laci Connor, c/o Postmaster, Modesto, CA 95099 as return, or, blank. USPS will deliver it. Put your own address if you wish, of course. Toujours l’Audace!

How about pastors, churches, organizations, etc? Unless your pastor/churchmembers are Dr. Dobson, Kieth Green, Francis Schaeffer, B16 or someone like that, then leave them all alone for now. This is a time for "yesses" and hope. And trying. The Lord needs many yesses right now. Groups
and organizations mean lawyers, and lawyers means "no."

How come we never heard about this before? These are the dying words of my dear sister: "The medical establishment knows how to cure/stop cancer. They don't do it because they'd be out of work."

Yowch. Sounds judgmental. OK, I'll accuse myself. We're all asleep. Wake up! Try this: In the mid-80's, a major pro-life organization asked Dr. Bernard Nathanson to reschedule for a speech five years in the future from then. Dr. Nathanson said, five years from now there shouldn't be a pro-life movement. I say, we have lost our sense of urgency, which should be no less than the urgency we feel if we see our son or grandson thrown under a bus. Nathanson knows what he's talking about. He's seen it with his own eyes. Most of us have not. It's just "an issue."

But Jesus is coming back soon ... right? Maybe. Maybe not. What if you're wrong? What if we're poised at the beginning of a millennium of more aggressive
Third World genocide (hint: "global warming" is the smokescreen), more Christian hospitals forced to hand out Plan B, more cloning, etc. What will you tell your grandchildren you were doing back when babies were being pulled to pieces? Just a thot. Another: don't mistake “signs and wonders” for just the sounds and whinings of yet another dying civilization, in a string of 'em back to the start.

I have a friend who prays. He says this won't work. It's in the flesh. In God's universe, prayer and faithful compassion are two parts of one thing, that we can't separate (James 4).

Another friend says flipping Roe won't work. He says we still have to go “state-to-state.” He says a Human Life Amendment is better. He's right, but you can't get to the HLA without going state-to-state anyway. It's in the Constitution. On the path to stopping all abortion, you have to go state-to-state, either post-Roe or pre-HLA. Either one helps bring about the other, and HLA is not on the boards right now. A post-Roe state-by-state debate and state legislation will set up HLA though, DV. One way or another, we've got to go state-to-state. There are no cheap solutions. One immediate effect of flipping Roe, in addition to setting up the necessary state-to-state thing for the HLA, is an immediate stop of 10-15% of abortions.

What about...? (Fill in the blank)
What about it? While we sit here talking, kids die, right? Let's just try this. We don't need to know the final step, we just need to know the next one, and to keep our hand in the Hand of the Lord. Any action like this will have the effect of bringing abortion back to the attention of the people, reminding them that we routinely kill kids. Even if this doesn't work, it should be tried. I guarantee that if we aim at nothing, we'll hit it. Right now, except for a tired, tiny handful of sidewalk and CPC workers, this country is completely comfortable with child dismemberment. Wouldn't you agree?

OK, so I tell my friends. Now what? What's next? The Lord knows the way through the wilderness, all we have to do is follow. He will show a way. I must admit, active in politics and action all my life, I've never been here before. But you know what? Let's dream together, and you tell me your dreams too: (to be concluded in the next issue)

The following is from a reaction to a NY Times article promoting sex-ed in the first grade (I can’t include the picture of the beautiful first-grader who is being brutalized):

C.S. Lewis once remarked, "Normal sexuality, far from being a given, is achieved by a long and delicate process of suggestion and adjustment which proves too difficult for some individuals and, at times, for whole societies."

If the question was ever in doubt, it should be no longer: the great majority of sex-ed enthusiasts and AIDS educators are sexual misfits themselves, and their fervid interest in getting into the classroom with children -- other people's children -- stems not from a desire to protect those children from harm but from the need to vindicate their own sexual choices. Normal persons have an innate sense of the dignity of human sexuality that makes them reticent to broach the subject with children, and especially with the children of strangers. Normal persons believe human sexuality is governed by moral norms, even if they differ on where the lines are drawn. But the folks coaching little Vineeta in the use of condoms are using her health as a pretext. They know perfectly well they're more likely give to her nightmares than to protect her from an unanticipated danger. They see her six-year-old's innocence, as they see all innocence, as a rebuke to their depravity. Hating that innocence, which must pain them
whenever they encounter it, they want to extinguish it as soon and as thoroughly as possible. That's why they want into the first grade classroom. Diogenes

Never have I encountered a more powerful argument for the reality of Hell: They see her six-year-old’s innocence, as they see all innocence, as a rebuke to their depravity. Hating that innocence, which must pain them whenever they encounter it, they want to extinguish it as soon and as thoroughly as possible. 

Hi John: I wish you could keep the skyp name. How about both: skyp-Abortion is Murder? I call it skip (like sky with a “p” on it).
Glad to see Paul Ross Evans has written. Sounds like he’s holding up well despite everything. America has its own tortures, sanitized or disguised. I think they try to break you or drive you mad, especially at first. I still remember the first three days after my arrest. In the Sedgwick County Jail in Wichita, they buzzed a loud buzzer in my cage every 15 minutes, day and night. That was supposedly in case I might be suicidal, which I’ve never been in my life. Despite their dirty tricks.
Just lost my good roomate. Hoping the new one isn’t like the other I still have (“Please, God!”).
Sorry this is so messy. I’m off to work now.
God bless you. Love, Shelley

Just for Shelley I came up with something.

Our story to date: S & H read a Newsweek article about how urban “tagging” (spray paint art/vandalism) has expanded of late into 3-D pre-cast expoxyed sculpture, wheat-paste-on-hustings lithographs, and cardboard stencils.
They hit on the idea one day of a mutual exchange: each one tags the other one’s central exchange (they’re telephone operators) while the local gal is at home in bed, alibized.
Stacy just ordered late dinner in a diner in Hutch’s town.
While she was eating, Stacy learned an important lesson she’d taken for granted in her own home town; a few miserable dollars goes a long way toward buying the right to be left alone, in a small town where, otherwise, the only question locals wanted to ask was, “You’re not from around here, are you?” and as friendly as it might sound, behind that question was the iron fist in the velvet glove” “What are you doing here anyway?”
Stacey knew that in the bigger scheme of things she could always bail herself out by saying she was here to visit her friend Hutch, and Hutch would bail her out of any trouble.
Stan But that would mean she couldn’t carry out her erstwhile promise of Stacey to tag Hutch‘s switch, and also, of anyone whosoever were sent to tag Hutch’s switch, suspicion would fall on local gal Hutch like rain in Indianapolis in the summertime, or for that matter, comprehensive medical on dentally challenged gift horses . . .
Where were we? Oh, yea, Stan. What a guy, her husband, faithful father to her kids, hard worker, and, to complete this dreamboat scenario – a nerd. A stick-in-the-mud, a killjoy, the kind of guy who when he hears the first cry of his first son, instead of crying himself, or laughing, or dancing, or joking, or poking fun at the goo-covered, he . . . almost instantly started talking tax deductions, expanded medical 401’s for college etc. etc. etc. Yeah, he could throw a baseball in the backyard to his sons . . . sort of, but he just tended to rain down Eeyore on everyone he met.
Usually this was bearable because he was the kind of guy whose car never breaks down, who always has enough for the mortgage, and all that. But still.
Stacey sighed. Here she was, having her little bet of middle-aged, kids getting good grades in high school little bit of fun, and her own husband wasn’t here to share it with her.
So, what did she tell him? It was all a symphony of cocked eyebrows, slow winks, and other etudes in the cantata of Tricky Dick plausible deniability, mated fruitfully with the Great Communicator’s famous 113 “I don’t recalls,” only a priori.
If you don’t know you can’t recall, can you? Stacey had made it as clear as possible without saying the words. Also, without saying the words, Stacey had made it clear that she’d be gone seventy-two hours, that the kids would be told Grandma was sick, which was certainly true since Grandma was union back to the New Deal, for Heaven’s sake.
That it might involve summat as serious as a technical misdemeanor if that at all, but in any even nothing like a felony, no guns no arson, no large amounts of cash and definitely no strangers. Without saying it in so many words, he insinuated who the guilty co-conspirator might be who put her up to this because he knew from the auto-body shop and emergency room bills that it was Hutch, or really, what happened when Hutch and Stacey got together and had a beer, was what was behind this He may be a real nerd but he wasn’t unperceptive, in his own funny nerdy way.
After his brow furrowed and furrowed, while they were talking out past the barbeque, which was where all sorts of discussions like this took place, chiefly what to do with teen age girls and post-adolescent boys, he finally relaxed a little bit, shrugged his shoulders and gazed affectionately at his wife, at which point, she smiled inside, and had a little elegiac moment.
Little did she know that these were the thoughts that were running through his nerdy, insurance adjuster’s mind.
Heaven forbid, even if she died doing this whatever it is she doesn’t want to tell me exactly what she is doing . . . Heaven forbid, the kids’re just old enough they’d make it without her.
Awful and cold as that sounds, it was actually a silent, quiet, personal act of compassion and humility.
Some of the other thoughts that ran through her boring-but-dependable, the-guy-who-didn’t-get-the-girl in Bringing Up Baby husband went along these lines:
My wife has always been there for me and our kids. She’s not running off to an ashram in California to hang out with some guru. She’s not stamping her foot and demanding a girl’s BMW to impress her friends, all kinds of mall bling (ditto), or trekking in the Himalayas; she’s not joining the Moonies, Heaven’s Gate, the Catholic charismaniacs in Italy or the popolators in Spain. She’s not insisting or demanding. Sounds like just a touch of 13-years-and-3-kids-later cabin fever that could be fixed with a thousand bucks and a thousand mile road trip, dammit, so what the hell?
When he was a boy, he put a tree house up and the first thing he hung on it was a sign saying “No Girls.” What’s the difference?
Sounds like the worst of it would be a call to their lawyer to get bail in a strange city, on a mild case . . . would that be so bad?
Especially compared to some of the alternatives.
He had an idea what she was up to better than she knew. He knew it was for a good cause. And he stopped short of asking the kind of question that might put her in a spot.
They kept it at the winking and nodding level, Tricky Dick or The Great Communicator sending out their troops, so that down the road, if necessary, he could say “What?!” or “I don’t recall.”
Stacey remembered Stan’s smile, and she smiled, eating in the diner, and she asked for a Yellow Pages.

Next up: Madrid/pullovers/a sense of someone up there likes me/ S&H hit the road . . . together? 

John, What do Jesse Helms, Henry Hyde, Georgia, Colorado, and Montana have in common?
Answer: They all found out the hard way that the Catholic Church will not back legislation that specifically raises the issue
of person status before birth. Instead, the Church has "not expressly committed itself" to an affirmation on that issue.
People get confused because the Church uses expressions like "as a person." But, if you read the disclaimer (the fine print) the Church clarifies that by that it only means "as if it were so."
Justice Harry Blackmun points this out in Roe v. Wade. Writing between the lines in the manner of subtlety, he says in effect:
Notice that I only had to sidestep the law of a PROTESTANT nation, the 1861 British Offenses Against the PERSON Act, in order to forge my conclusion that "[i]n short, the unborn have never been recognized in the law as persons in the whole sense."
In contrast, even to this day, no CATHOLIC country has ever
presented me with a challenge on the specific issue of person status, not in the whole of history leading up to the present, not even if we include Vatican City-State itself. Now that has to be MORE than a coincidence.
Of course, it was more than a coincidence. The Church is a very busy bee. For example, when Helms and Hyde proposed the Human Life Bill to contradict Blackmun, by having the United States recognize the unborn in the law as persons in the whole sense, the Catholic Church swallowed up the measure like a sink hole, and persuaded the National Right to Life Committee to serve as its ongoing henchman for such legislation here in the United States.
Instead, the Church backed the Hatch Amendment, proposed by Mormon Senator Orin Hatch, because, like the Catholic Church, the Mormon Church also has a problem with express recognition for the unborn person in the law. Abortion is one thing. Another is the specific issue of formal legal recognition for the unborn person. For this reason, the Hatch Amendment specifically fell short of contradicting Blackmun where he says, "In short, the unborn have never been recognized in the law as persons in the whole sense." Instead, the Hatch Amendment fell short of such
recognition. But the Catholic Church is so tricky with its
position, trying to play both sides, that people become confused and think the Church is open to an affirmation of the unborn as persons in the whole sense, as opposed to in the as-if-it-were-so sense.
For example, in Colorado, people mistakenly thought they had received an endorsement from the Church for an amendment raising the specific issue of person status. But the Catholic Church quickly alerted the press that this was not so.
Like Helms and Hyde, they thought they were standing on a Rock of support from the Catholic Church. Instead, they were standing on a sink hole!
Moral of the Story: Don't be tricked by the doublespeak of the Catholic Church. If you want to push legislation that specifically affirms the person status of the unborn, your chief opponents that you have to put up your shields against are going to be 1) the Catholic Church, 2) the U.S. Supreme Court, 3) the Mormon Church, and 4) Planned Parenthood.
If you want to "Rock for Life" be sure you're really
standing on one! Sincerely, Cal

Powerful letter from Cal. My own take is different. I remember thirty or so years ago attacking Catholic Eye editor Jim McFadden for saying just about what Cal says here. I accused Jim of opposing Hatch mainly because the bishops supported it. As I remember, it was a clear case of “divide and conquer” and both prolife sides were at fault.
On the other issue Cal raises, that the Catholic Church does not recognize the preemie as a person -- nonsense. In fact, it is the status of the young person that has caused the ongoing fifth schism in The Chosen People of the New Testament. The Church teaches not only that the preemie is a person but that she is a person more in need of protection than you or I or our own born children.
Here’s the proof: if I help to kill your two-year-old, the Church teaches that I have committed a mortal sin and must go to confession before I am forgiven. However, if I help to kill her before she is born, She says that I am no longer one of The Chosen People. The second is the more horrible consequence.
What does it mean for Catholics, then, when hundreds of the very worst kinds of murders are being committed next door to them every week? It means they have three choices -- jail or execution if, like Jim Kopp and Paul Hill., they defend the victims realistically, cowardice if, like me, they are afraid to do that, or departure if they cannot face either consequence.
Observe a Sunday Mass at any Catholic Church in the United States. Everybody in that church will be one of the faithful departed. In other words they will all be modernists. Modernists are former Catholics because they will not or can not accept something the Church teaches.
This brings me back to Cal’s letter. The doublespeak that disturbs Cal is the doublespeak of modernists, not Catholics. It is the doublespeak of people who will not oppose the massive and monstrous murders realistically and will not admit, even to themselves, that they are afraid to do that. Hence, doublespeak.
 

Mr. Dunkle, I received the May #2 issue of Abortion is Murder, and I read the letter you published from Elizabeth Cox. You asked (in parentheses) for bios, so here is mine with a little about how I got involved defending the preborn.
I was born November 18, 1980, on Cherry Point Marine Air Station, in Havelock, North Carolina. Both of my parents were serving in the U.S. Navy.
I was raised in southern Maryland and, as a child, survived two bouts with cancer (tumors on my kidneys). After chemotherapy and the removal of my right and part of my left kidneys, all was well thanks to the Grade A doctors at Walter Reed Army Medical Center.
Even as a teenager I tended toward the extreme. (Really? That doesn’t sound like the peaceful, law-abiding Robert we all know and love.) Any idea, concept, or movement that came along and rubbed me right, I dove into full force. I was an extremist looking for the right cause. I tried just about every movement on the spectrum. God has fashioned me into an “all or nothing” type of person. I just needed to discover why he did so.
Looking back I see that in every movement I joined I learned things that I would later use in defense of the preborn, from protest methods to bomb designs to burglary tactics.

My own personal anti-babymurder crusade started while I was dabbling in some of these other movements. That is when I first came across the websites for (Don Spitz and Neal Horsley will love this) the Army of God and the Nuremburg Files. My exposure to these sites planted seeds that would sprout years later.
In 2004 I joined the Knights of Columbus and immediately got involved with their pro-life activities. I got involved on the illegal end of things soon after. (For obvious reasons I will not list the actions I took; it is sufficient to say the acts were numerous with varying degrees of damage done to the mills. Never enough though!) The only person who knew about these actions was a close friend named John Marcus. (A note to the baby-butcher protecting feds – Mr. Marcus has since passed away and is therefore well outside your jurisdiction.)

I’ll finish Robert Weiler’s bio in the next issue and I’ll include all of Paul Ross Evans’s.

Prisoners of Christ Anti-Abortionists Web Page.

 To view helpless babies murdered by BABYKILLING ABORTIONISTS click here.

 Back to Army of God homepage.

 E-mail: Glory2Jesus@ArmyofGod.com
 Telephone 1-757-204-4454
 Or write to: Rev. Don Spitz
                     Pro-Life Virginia
                     P.O. Box 2876
                    Chesapeake VA 23327