Paul
Ross Evans
September 5, AD 2008
Paul
Ross Evans
September 5, AD 2008
Christendom is comforting solidity in a world of confusion. It should be understood that grievances that manifest into force to defend the unborn are easy enough to identify, yet not simple enough to abandon for the Christian: abandonment of beliefs and ethics. Most Pro-Choice advocates do not realize what they expect from Christians, in asking them to adopt a non-theistic value system. This compromising inevitably leads to submission and abandonment of values. For us that is dangerous ground, to say the least.
Contrary to what others would perceive, I understand, yet disagree entirely with the stance of most Pro-Choicers. This standpoint, if not involving a child's life, would normally be valid. I am usually at odds with all forms of tyrannical control, outside of normal law enforcement, which is completely necessary in any civilization.
Seemingly, a woman has the right to choose (hence, "Pro-Choice") what she does with her own body. This is something I completely agree with. What I, and other Christian Pro-Life advocates have a problem with is when "Woman X" decides to kill, or decides to have killed, another human being.
In scientific fact, a child has already developed significantly within just a few weeks. The mother carries the child, and nourishes him or her. But this person is a separate human being. This is why Laci and Conner Peterson, with Conner's Law, opened the eyes of those who are still paying attention. Under the protection of Conner's Law, a child is considered by law to be a separate human life, and when a murderer takes the life of a pregnant woman, he kills two human lives by law. Yet laws validate neither the human life of preborn children, nor do laws validate that they are human souls and human spirits. Roe v. Wade confuses many. The term "Pro-Choice" always made me wonder why the child never had a choice in the matter, and when they arrived at their places in Heaven if they wondered why they never had much of a choice. Pro-Choicers claim that since the child is dependent and relies on the mother, the child has no soul and can morally be killed by an "authoritative nurturer" unobjectionably. This certainly opens the door to kill the elderly, infants (infanticide), and the sick and handicapped. Is this acceptable as well?
More and more I hear the rape scenario rear its head. First of all, I feel that any rapist should be punished to the severity of the law. This angers me just as much as the abortion issue. Factually, however, babies aborted as the result of rape represent maybe one percent of all aborted babies. I have even known very special women who give life to these children, and in turn open a door to a lifetime of love from the child involved. Abortion is not the inevitable finality of this situation, as all who support abortion widely claim. Most of all, what is troubling is that most Pro-Choicers don't want a choice to be made, especially in a situation like rape, only the firm decision of abortion.
Over 50 million children have been aborted since the Roe v. Wade decision, and meanwhile, millions of families every year wait to adopt children -- and wait -- and wait. Mostly they are unavailable to couples, sometimes for decades. Then, as always concerning this topic, Pro-Choicers claim that the child will "always be abused in foster care." This is simply very untrue, in an "always" scenario.
The majority of abused children were not adopted at all. They are beaten, tortured, and/or molested, either by parents who wanted and planned their births, or by a blood relative. It is my belief, in fact, that abortion is the most extreme form of abuse of children. The argument of the potentiality of child abuse being the reason to murder a child is obviously absurd.
The whole debate causes reason for Christians to lift their heads realistically, or so it should, with the possibility that in the future, more and more of their principles could be compromised, until we have no more room left to slide down the slippery slope of subjugation. In actuality, according to statistical truth, most Americans are not Pro-Life or Pro-Choice; they are considered very much undecided. Many seem to lack understanding, or even compassion in most cases, or even their part in its consequence. Meanwhile, each year 3.5 million more children are murdered.
I perceive that there are many Pro-Choice advocates who hesitate to let the government control yet another aspect of life. Undoubtedly, I can relate to that. Personally, I am passionately against all of the ways that the government forces the chains of subjugation upon us, slyly, link by link. This is a question of taking a child's life, however. Our window of attempting to control nature is over. Modern naturalists and Liberal Rationalists would have us believe that we are aiding the oppressors.
I am of the opinion that the more individual souls that are led to accepting Jesus Christ, the more people will accept a Pro-Life standpoint. I have met Christians who adhere to quality-of-life principles, when truly this is a non-theistic stance. There are also some Christians who seem to disagree with abortion, however, they balk at working to outlaw it once again. Information about the violent process, God's Law concerning such subjects, truth about the aftermarket harvest and sale of the bodies of dead fetuses, and leading others to Christ in general will eventually lead many others to condemn this act as murder.
Law enforcement agents even, many of whom I have met, especially at a Federal level, often disagree passionately with abortion. Many are Christians, but adhere to a "just following my orders" position, which is tragic. Let us remember that this country was more or less founded by a group of middle-aged Christians who wished to live openly with their passion for Christianity. I believe many who are caught in such crossroads should look to scripture and prayer to discover what is the most important in a world which will soon vanish in an instant.
Liberal approaches to morals, to belief systems in realistically governing any large society, are directly linked to crime increases and to complete disorder. Liberalism, feminism, Communism, socialism, Fascism, and pacifism, are all diseases that threaten the life of Western civilization. In exploring the extremes that pull us away from the beautiful potential of renewing America as a Christian nation once again, we discover that we are barbarians who endorse such tragedies as abortion, as did past socialist, National Socialist, and Communist societies.
Enunciatingly, those supporters of global socialism, through pacifist, liberal, Communist, racist and anti-Christian agendas seemingly write the script in terms of what is commonly accepted as truth. From a Christian perspective, I shed light on how often we are in a position of forced compromise, combating grossly naturalist biases in a nation that exclaims, no matter what, we act in the "continual primitivism of the Fundamental Right." Abortion specifically, along with practices such as euthanasia, are examples, in rudimentary form, of the decline of our cultures and civilizations. Values that men have fought and died for are all but garbage in today's society of progressive acceptance.
The nuclei of adversarial strategy in our situation is that our enemies attempt to keep us on the defensive. Using insults and ridicule, they continue to postpone doing something about the real problems and/or confronting the real issues.
According to a wide variety of surveys, over 80% of women didn't seem to make much of a choice at all; rather, they followed through with the abortion because someone else in their lives wanted it that way. They did this to please someone they were in a relationship with, or, in many situations, to please their own parents.
I've heard Pro-Choice advocates debate their opinion concerning comparing the aborticide phenomenon with genocide in Nazi concentration camps. They exclaim, "The process of abortion is not forced!" Not forced? Not forced upon whom? The child evidently has no voice. The sanctity-of-life ethic is no different, "allowing parents to kill children with predetermined birth defects." This tolerance is an extremely anti-Christian victory. Legal codes protecting what are widely referred to as "groups of cells," or "potential life," are mostly non-existent, and, where they do exist, are never enforced. The comparison of a fetus to an organ in the body, even in the interpretation of many doctors, is simply absurd. Yet most fetal experimentations involve horrible atrocities such as killing live children after a healthy/unhealthy birth, or dissecting them to "study" their still-beating hearts. Where do we get the notion that we are given the authority to remove tissue from a child still dying on the table before us (a practice often used) and conducting such non-therapeutic activities?
The stipulations and/or regulations (or, more importantly, the lack of thereof) concerning solid law protecting the child after abortion from such "scientific" endeavors are eerily absent. Roe v. Wade clearly states that the mother's rights cease to prevail once the fetus is expelled from the womb, and U. S. Constitutional protection comes with this act. Considerably, this is evidently abandoned in the fetal research by classifying fetuses as
viable: still alive after abortion, and
pre-viable: a fetus who is about to be, or who already has been, aborted.
Abortion is an outright rejection of bearing children, motherhood, and the sacredness of family. In turn, fetal experimentation marks the ill-fated barbarous government, and certain societies which are destined for failure.
Surveys conducted widely by common American newspapers state that at least half of women who have had one or more abortions "feel extreme guilt," and at least one fourth "regret the abortion entirely." This is just a small percentage of Americans who are being honest with themselves, or are even in a position yet to speak about such troubling matters.
Initially, upon contemplation of this circumstance, it is in order to make apparent these facts once more, as the American public seems to use them primarily as excuses:
a.) almost all of the babies aborted today are completely healthy and virtually none of the pregnancies pose any threat to the lives or to the health of the mothers, and
b.) almost all of the abortions done in the United States are done for non-medical reasons, and
c.) virtually none of the pregnancies were the result of rape or incest.
These children are killed with an instrument that kills more human beings than any weapon available. More lives are lost by this tool than on any battlefield in the world, at any time. The "weapon of choice" is an instrument of more murder than any firearm or explosive on this planet.
Several "medical techniques" exist for killing children. During the first trimester, endometrial aspiration and suction are commonly used. In endometrial aspiration, a thin flexible tube called a cannula is used to literally suck the babies out of their mothers. Children, during this act, are vacuumed out of the cervical canal piece by piece.
For a time, partial-birth abortion was used, primarily because those abortionists who sold the dead child's body parts for the sake of "scientific progress" could not use them if they had been "ripped or mistreated." During this procedure, a child was grasped by a leg or legs with tongs and pulled out of his/her mother, except for the head, feet first and face down. The base of the child's skull was then punctured, normally with scissors. Finally, the child's brain would then be sucked out with the cannula. Sometimes the "doctor" would break the child's neck, or use the tongs to basically beat the child to death. Many times the child would be born moving, with his heart beating, etc. Many times they were placed into steel pans and drowned with sterile water.
In a related technique, suction curettage or vacuum curettage is used to kill children. The cervical canal is enlarged by a series of metal dilators while the mother is under anesthesia, after which the cannula is used again, in the uterus with an electric pump, to "evacuate its contents."
During the second trimester, the injection of saline solution is used to induce uterine contractions. Also, prostaglandins are used, by means of injection or suppository, to induce contractions and expel children still very much dependent on their mothers. This is why anti-abortion demonstrators routinely display graphic pictures depicting aborted children in public places. Surely if the world knew of the specifics of this tragedy, they would do something about America's Holocaust! Strangely, many of the nonviolent protesters who display these graphic images are met with ridicule and violence because they have "disrupted liberal America's day" with revealing pictures of reality. There is no doubt that many Christian Pro-Lifers have attempted tediously to have pictures exposed on certain facets of television and film. We see war victims, routine murder, and promiscuous sex acts, but never a picture of an aborted child. Imagine a womb in transparency, holding a beautiful child. Imagine now that the child is publicly murdered, and the outrage that this act, and the coverage of it, would generate among audiences. Truly those who display such images to passersby attempt to give the child a voice.
Roe v. Wade, the January 22, 1973 decision in which the United States Supreme Court ruled that state laws could not prohibit women from having abortions, among other specific regulations, is a precarious landmark case in general. Henry Wade, the Dallas County district attorney, was sued by Norma McCorvey, a pregnant unmarried carnival worker, after McCorvey had been denied an abortion in Texas in 1969. At the time, Texas law permitted abortions only when the woman's life was in danger. At the time of this calamity, the liberal and feminist attorneys who represented Norma McCorvey (aka "Jane Roe") needed a pregnant woman to "defend." Most don't even realize that after McCorvey and her attorneys vehemently challenged the Supreme Court, McCorvey never received an abortion, because her case was not decided until after the child had already been born. After the case was over, and the abomination of legalized abortion "set in stone," McCorvey realized that she had simply been used, and then subsequently disregarded, in a much larger scheme having a specific predetermined goal. An allegation that "Jane Roe" had been raped was also used to influence the final decision, although the rape claim was, in fact, entirely untrue. By 1995, most don't know, Norma McCorvey had become a passionate Christian and an advocate/member of the Pro-Life movement.
The Roe v. Wade decision was based primarily on the interpretation that the Bill of Rights of the U. S. Constitution created a "zone of privacy," where the State cannot violate. They divided the nine months of pregnancy into trimesters, and defined certain regulations concerning them. Other cases followed, accompanying this, as well as widespread dispute.
In my personal stance against the systematic murder of children, I refuse to use euphemisms, such as "doctor" as a substitute for "murderer." I refuse to use a gentle word like "clinic" as well, for a building that houses the embodiment of all of my rage, and the hosts of wickedness on this Earth. This explanation is a prerequisite, considering the widespread denial that the agendum of abortion is in fact, murder. My intention is simply to awaken the general public of the country which has chained me for three and a half decades, as a sentence for my fight to rid our great nation of this blight on our society.
Decomposition of Western civilization is at every avenue of modern society. Rudimentary investigations behold abundant examples of the enveloping decadence and the pretentious maleficence with which our society is infected. Our sophomoric opposition uses an ignorant ridiculing posture when clashing with those of us who still have an interest in the direction of our society's future. Certainly, tragedies such as abortion and euthanasia are clear indicators of the revolutionary liberal agenda that this country has embraced, and the value each of our futures and lives merit in today's "free thinking" pacifist culture.
The anti-Christian advance cannot and will not be tolerated. It has a mind like an animal, possessing a complete abandonment for human worthiness and an insensibility to any sort of agony or misery. Those who lack empathy for the unborn, the handicapped, the weak, and the helpless, cannot be allowed to rape the sanctity of man.
We walk among a great storm during the present day. The winds of tyranny beat our faces and the rains of open-mindedness drench us. In our stance, and our proclamation that we are firm and unchanging in our beliefs, we weather the storm and live to see the fruition of our dream, during those years since the killers set out to destroy our youth.
Abortion is murder, and as Christians we follow a doctrinal faith. The message that we follow cannot be compromised, even if we do not fight and simply believe. Our faith cannot "evolve to fit into new ages." The embodiment of society's denial of the past is evident in this situation. Consider how many civilizations have collapsed just after they began to accept these specific types of behavior.
Eventually a cold shadow will envelop this Earth. We must be sure to abandon any sanctioning, enabling, or approval of any kind, of practices such as abortion, the occult, and the worship of idols of science, intellect, polytheists, and those who protect the liberal agenda. Liberal agendas will allow abortionists to murder millions of children before the eventual destruction of modern government. The Babylon our nation had become is destined for failure. Those who do not separate themselves from it will fall as well. These are times of black and white, and the period of half-stepping and second-guessing is over.
It is comforting to know that, as in all storms, we will see the light break over the gray clouds of doom that seem all-powerful at present. Jesus does save. This fact will be most apparent to those who are still walking the face of this Earth when He returns to those of us who remained faithful and true, and who trusted in Him, and embraced Him.
Paul R. Evans
U. S. Penitentiary McCreary -- AD 2008
(Paul wrote that he would like to communicate with Christians and anti-abortionists.)
Mailing address on POC page or on Paul's homepage.
E-mail
Put prisoner name in subject
line and include a mailing address for a reply
Paul Ross Evans arrested on April 27, 2007 AD as a
suspect after an explosive device was found at the Austin Women's
Health Center abortion mill, located at 1902 S. Interstate 35, north of
Oltorf Street. The makeshift bomb contained two pounds (910 grams) of nails.
Mr. Evans was charged with use of weapons of mass
destruction, manufacture of explosive material and violating freedom of
access to clinic entrances.
Paul Ross Evans sentenced to 40 years in federal prison.
Projected Release date 03-02-2042
To send financial help, please send money order and put
Paul Ross Evans 83230-180 on Postal Money Order in the pay to section
and mail to the address below. No letters, notes or checks. Just the Postal
Money Order.
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Paul Ross Evans 83230-180
P.O. Box 474701
Des Moines IA 50947-0001
Back to the Prisoner of Christ homepage
E-mail: Glory2Jesus@ArmyofGod.com
Telephone 1-757-204-4454
Write to: Pro-Life Virginia
P.O. Box 2876
Chesapeake VA 23327
Another unborn baby murdered by a
babykilling abortionist.
