c2
BIBLICAL BASIS:
God is Sovereign in birth. He opens & shuts the womb;
He blesses
with children. (The following verses are NOT an exhaustive
list.)
It is GOD Who
opens and shuts the womb: Genesis 20:17-18;
29:31-33; 30:1-2,6,17-18, 20, 22, 23; I Samuel 1:6, 11,
19, 20;
God helps and
participates in the process of bringing forth children:
Genesis 4:1, 25; 21:1-2; Ruth 4:13; I Samuel 2:20-21;
Psalm 139:13, 16;
Luke 1:21-25, 57-58
God multiplies
children: Genesis 16:10; 17: 2,20; 22:17; 26:4, 24;
28:3; 41:52; 48:4; Exodus 32:13; Deuteronomy 1:10,11;
28:63; 30:5,
Joshua 24:3; I Chronicles 27: 23; Psalm 105:24; 107:38;
Isaiah 26:15; 51:2; Jeremiah 30: 19; 33:22; Ezra 36:10-11, 37; 37:26
The Bible nowhere encourages B.C., but everywhere condones fertility!
Pro-child verses: Psalm 127:3-5; 128; I Chronicles 20:4-5; Exodus 23:25-26; Proverbs 17:6
Children are a blessing that comes from obeying God: Leviticus 26:9; Deuteronomy 28:1-4; 6:3; 7:13; 13:17 ff
Pro-Fertility
verses: Leviticus 20:18 (abstaining during monthly periods increases chance
of fertilization after period);
Genesis 1:27-28 (The command
to be fruitful has never been revoked); I Cor 7:3-5 (Not compatible with
"Natural Family Planning")
Anti-Infertility
Verses: Infertile manners of intercourse were condemned: Beastiality (Leviticus
20:15, 16), Homosexuality (Leviticus 20:13), Withdrawal (Genesis 38:6-10,
Deuteronomy 25:5-10). In fact, all of these things incurred
the death penalty. There was no death penalty for improper
manners of intercourse which were yet fertile (Fornication and polygamy).
Semen is referred to as offspring even before it joins the egg: Hebrews 7:9-10; Job 10:8-11
Childlessness is a curse: Leviticus 20:20-21; Hosea 9:10-17
Having children is part of the whole picture of a family:
The Father is to provide for his family--I Timothy 5:8; Ephesians 6:4
The Mother is to work at home and have children: I Timothy 2:15; Titus 2:3-5, Malachi 2:15, I Timothy 5:9,10, 14
Children are a blessing to parents: Proverbs 10:1; 23:24-25; Mark 7: 10-13
Parents are to teach children: Deuteronomy 6:7; 11:19
HISTORY:
B.C. has existed for millennia. Ancient Egyptian papyruses
have
been discovered with references to chemical contraceptives.
The
IUD was used by ancient Arabic caravan traders. Infanticide
has
always been widespread in pagan cultures either through
sacrifices to appease spirits or through abandonment
(i.e. Oedipus Rex).
God's people, Israel, did not practice B.C. They WANTED
all the
children they could get and considered them an unqualified
blessing. The one man mentioned as practicing B.C., Onan,
was
struck dead for it. (Onan's judgment was not due to a
simple
refusal to raise up offspring for the widow. If he wanted
to refuse
that duty, he could have followed the teaching of Deuteronomy
25:5-10, as Ruth's nearest-of-kin did, removed his sandal,
and passed
on the responsibility to the next-nearest-of-kin--which,
in
Ruth's case was Boaz. See Ruth 4:1-12. No, the issue
was that Onan
practiced birth control by spilling his seed.)
Christians have also historically not practiced B.C. This
is not a
Roman Catholic church issue--their practice is a carry-over
from a
time when ALL Christians did not practice B.C. The Protestant
Synod of Dort equated contraception with abortion. Martin
Luther,
John Calvin, John Wesley, and many other founders of
Protestantism
linked B.C. with murder. The Pilgrims who founded our
country
considered B.C. as bad as adultery and disqualified anyone
from church leadership who practiced it.
The change of Christians in the U.S. to using B.C. has
been concurrent
with many other bad trends: feminism, higher criticism,
worldliness,
abuse of spiritual gifts and church offices, decline
of purity in the church,
and a lack of evangelism and discipleship. There is more
recently,
however, a growing movement in the U.S. of Christians
ditching B.C.
Obviously, we shouldn't base our position on whether or
not
OTHER people practice B.C., but if the non-use of B.C.
has been a
universal trend for the vast majority of Christian history,
we should
not lightly dismiss it, but rather examine WHY.
CON'S OF B.C.:
All forms of
B.C. increase abortion. Contrary to what some
doctors say, there is no such thing as a chemical contraceptive
(Pill, implant) that does not cause abortion from 2-5%
of the time.
Although the primary function of most of these "Pills"
is to
prevent ovulation, they do not prevent all ovulation
(people still
occasionally get pregnant), so they ALL have a secondary
function
of irritating the lining of the uterus so that a fertilized
egg will not be
able to implant, and thus will abort. There are several
other pills
whose primary effect is to abort fertilized eggs; the
IUD also does
this as its primary function. Apparently, the body also
aborts some
pregnancies naturally at very early stages, without provocation,
and all methods of mechanical prevention of fertilization
(condom, diaphragm, Rhythm, N.F.P.) actually increase
the number
of these natural abortions by perpetuating the monthly
menstrual cycle,
which can be suspended if a woman gets pregnant often.
Biblical support
is missing: B.C. puts a Christian in the shaky
position of Onan, who was killed. I Corinthians 7:3-5
gives the only
reason for abstinence in marriage--Prayer and fasting,
not to avoid
children. Leviticus 12:1-5 and 20:18 establish a sexual
pattern that
actually increases fertility rather than decreasing it!
It's inconvenient:
I have never heard a single positive comment
about diaphragms and spermicidal jelly or condoms from
people
who use them (and condoms are not highly effective at
preventing
fertilization anyway). And, of course, it's not fun to
abstain for
long periods of time as per the "Rhythm" or "Natural
Family Planning"
methods; abstaining for long periods of time can contribute
to the
sin of adultery. Using B.C. methods causes a woman to
undergo
uncomfortable periods every month, but going without
B.C.,
periods can be rare.
Health problems:
If you take the pill, you are five times more
likely to die of circulatory disorders. The pill can
also cause
permanent infertility and a host of other major and minor
problems.
The IUD often causes lacerations in the uterus which
result in severe
pain and permanent infertility. Abortion is a serious
cause of breast
cancer. It is also a proven fact that the longer
child-bearing is delayed,
the more likely a woman is to get endometriosis.
OBJECTIONS HOLD NO WATER:
Overpopulation
is a local problem in some cities, but it is not
a world crisis. If every person in the world today were
given one
acre of land (therefore families living together would
have far more
than 1 acre of land), everyone living in the world today
could just
about fit within the Continental U.S. alone. (According
to agricultural
studies, an acre would give far more than enough
land for living
space and food-production for one person!) It is also
a fact that
humans adapt and create new methods of coping with scarce
resources.
Over a thousand years ago, thinkers were afraid that
the earth was too
overpopulated then for the human race to survive,
but we have
adapted fine!
Multiplying like rabbits: The average number of children borne by monogamous couples not practicing birth control is only five!
Cost: The scary,
high figures you see quoted are based on
expensive C-sections, baby formula, baby food, frivolous
baby furniture,
not getting a baby shower, using day care, etc., all
of which is unnecessary.
It doesn't take long before children are old enough to
become income
producers, anyway. Additionally, God provides for His
children.
See Psalm 23:1; 37:25-26; 84:11; Proverbs 3:33; 14:26;
Malachi 3:8-10;
Matthew 6:25-34; Philippians 4:6, 19; I Timothy 6:6-10.
The myth that
children of large families are less intelligent is
sheer bunk. 76% of U.S. Presidents came from families
of 5 or
more children! Almost every famous Classical musician
came
from a family of more than 7. Comparing an upper-income
only-child with the 10 children of a dysfunctional family
in the
"Projects" is comparing apples and oranges; intelligence
is based on the intelligence and discipline of the parents, not the number
of children.
Stewardship:
Look at the famous passage on stewardship:
the Parable of the Talents in Matthew 25:14-30. Who decided
how
many talents each servant could steward, the servant
or the Master?
Technology
is good. Not necessarily so. The H-bomb is intelligent,
highly advanced technology, but that doesn't mean we
should blow
up the world with it! Simply because technology (such
as the Pill)
is available doesn't mean we should use it! We must first
evaluate the
moral ramifications of its use.
What if I have
health problems? There may be exceptions,
but are you looking for an excuse, or are you trying
to be faithful to God? Although many doctors won't admit it, many female
problems would
be solved rather than exacerbated by having children.
One woman
who had a hole in her lung that would not heal was told
never to have
children because she could not provide enough oxygen
for two.
She got pregnant anyway, and the pressure of the growing
uterus
against the lung sealed the hole and healed it!
Bible only
for Agrarian community. No, God's principles apply
to all cultures. The famous verse about having a "full
quiver" of children
(Psalm 127:3-5) was written by a politician in a big
city and was written
about a soldier. The context is not agrarian at all!
Sex only for
Procreation? No, this is the Argumentum ad absurdum
fallacy. Notice that there is a difference between
trying to avoid children,
trying to create children, and not worrying about it
either way.
We believe the Bible teaches that the last of the three
is the best!
Besides, no matter which of the three approaches you
take, you can't
help having pleasure, therefore sex by its very nature
is not limited
to procreation!
A sovereign
God can override B.C. Let us apply the same logic
to another context: suppose a murderer were to say, "I've
bought a
knife, and I'm going over to Fred's house to kill him,
but if God
doesn't want me to kill Fred in cold blood, He will find
a way to
stop me." This logical progression is exactly the same
as that of
someone who says they don't know whether B.C. is wrong
or not,
but that they will do it anyway and God will stop them
if it's wrong.
This is not a logical position. It is irresponsible to
purposefully not
decide whether what you're doing is right or wrong! Here's
one
more question:
"Why would God want to give children to someone who doesn't
want them?"
CONCLUSION
Given the Bible's pro-children stance and its anti-infertility
stance,
given the fact that Christians have historically not
practiced birth
control, given the problems caused by birth control,
and given the
fact that most reasons for using birth control are not
valid, it is a
reasonable and good conclusion for a Christian to not
practice birth
control.
Revelation 20:15
And whosoever was not found written
in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire.
Isaiah 59:2
For your hands are defiled with
blood, and your fingers with iniquity; your lips have
spoken lies, your tongue hath muttered
perverseness.
Back to Birth Control is a Sin homepage.
To
view helpless babies murdered by BABYKILLING
ABORTIONISTS like BARNETT SLEPIAN click here.